Senator Elizabeth Warren denounced President Trump's election as the product of an "ugly stew of racism" that propelled him to the top.

So given that she considers herself a Native American minority and has sought affirmative action privileges with that so-claimed designation, what she's saying is that a vote against her or her party could have been due only to racism, never a popular rejection of her socialist ideas.

Logic of that sort is why Instapundit's Glenn Reynolds can often say: "Want More Trump?  That's how you get More Trump."

Warren;s contempt for America's votes couldn't be more obvious.  If it was an ugly stew of racism that got Trump elected, is it not a little patronizing that Warrren also could say, in an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow:

People are right to be angry, but Donald Trump said it's their fault – those other people.  Those people who don't worship like you, those people who don't look like you, those people who aren't the same color as you.

So all those Trump-voting racists are right to be angry – is that it?  Since when does one justify a racist's right to be angry?  Only when one is a Democrat who still hasn't gotten over Hillary Clinton's loss and needs a few insults to hurl at the people who kept her party out of power.