Recently The Daily Mail reported on a study that revealed AI systems are likely to impact around 80 percent of US jobs.

The research, conducted by Artificial Intelligence (AI) developers - OpenAI and the University of Pennsylvania, also discovered that 15 percent of all worker tasks could be accomplished more efficiently by AI and with identical quality.

Concerns that AI apps could replace human workers caused headlines last November after the launch of the advanced AI App ChatGPT.

'GPT' in ChatGPT stands for generative pre-trained transformer, which enables applications to learn from past records and produce human-like text.

ChatGPT can perform tasks such as writing emails, columns, resumes, etc. and even mimic the writing styles of other authors.

Perhaps you can summon the ChatGPT to write columns in the style of Ernest Hemmingway. The app purportedly mimics Hemmingway in its construction of sentences, choice of words, and ideas without plagiarizing directly from any of Hemmingway’s works.

Back to the University of Pennsylvania study.

1,016 occupations and their 19,265 tasks were analyzed to evaluate which tasks could be done by AI applications.

The overall findings show that at least 10 percent of work tasks are affected by the introduction of the Large Language Model (LLM), while approximately 19 percent of workers may see at least 50 percent of their tasks impacted'

LLM in AI refers to AI models that can generate language texts on any topic or domain by studying large volumes of data.

The study also evaluated qualities such as critical thinking, listening, and speaking, and compared how the AI ranked for those qualities for specific jobs.

The inference was that 86 occupations were "fully exposed" to AI -- i.e., the tasks can be achieved by the AI apps entirely.

The most at-risk are white-collar jobs, such as mathematicians, accountants, writers, etc.

However, jobs that need tactical or strategic thinking or innovation such as marketing strategists, etc. scored poorly with just 15 percent of tasks being replaced by AI.

Blue-collar jobs such as dishwashers, electricians, barbers, etc. are obviously safe from the AI application, perhaps until robot technology becomes more affordable and user friendly.

A few days back it was revealed that an Indian Court used ChatGPT as one of the inputs while ruling on an order for bail in a murder case.

So can humans be replaced by AI

Let's revisit the Hemmingway example.

The AI can mimic Hemmingway's style of writing and perhaps his ideas by studying Hemmingway's previous works. 

But AI obviously cannot predict human beings changing their mind following personal experiences or global events.

Perhaps Hemmingway’s style of writing and opinions would have evolved had he lived longer, but the app cannot fathom that eventuality.

The AI may be able to perform all tasks performed by an accountant more efficiently than a human being.  But the human accountant could devise easier practices of bookkeeping and apply his acumen to ensure that his client pays the least amount without violating tax law.

Where the AI app could fail is innovation.

But for repetitive tasks, AI apps could be a blessing, especially for smaller businesses who cannot afford to employ multiple personnel.

What about AI bot bias and control?

We learned a valuable lesson from big tech's usage of social media.

The likes of Twitter and Facebook wriggled their way into the personal and professional lives of people and even became the official channel of communication for governments.

Once they developed a monopoly, they began manipulating the discourse to benefit certain vested interests rather than merely reflecting public opinion.

A recent report revealed that the ChatGPT struggled to define a woman, praising Democrats but not Republicans, refused to defend fossil fuels, and claimed nukes are less dangerous than racism.

If humans become overly reliant on AI apps, there will come a time when they take over without humans noticing.

The impact could be information suppression - the AI app doesn’t present information that expresses skepticism about man-made climate change, the COVID-19 vaccine, etc. This is already happening with Google.

The app could be used by governments to control and monitor citizens.

If the app controls your home security system, the government could collude with the developers or application administrator keep you locked indoors because you are unvaccinated; the app merely has to look through the government vaccination database to find that information. Perhaps you will be locked on Election Day because the app knows you will vote for Trump based on your social media behavior.  Naturally, the firm handling the AI app would claim that an intern made that mistake.

Perhaps the application monitors your conversations and notifies government officials of ‘extremist’ ideas.  Amazon’s Alexa could be tweaked a bit to have that capability.

We are already aware of deep fake technology where AI manipulates videos and can even replace the likeness of one person with another.

The following one minute video shows how deeply fake technology replaced the images of the actor who played Han Solo in Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) with that of Harrison Ford.

With some more refinement, this technology could be used to alter video footage to incriminate an individual in a court of law.

Perhaps the technology can be used in a political campaign to make it appear that a political opponent has used offensive invectives or has insulted his supporters.  We need to be vigilant about is governments using AI technology to bolster their power.

These AI apps also present a serious risk to educational institutions.

New York University explicitly prohibits the use of ChatGPT for completing assignments and quizzes. Students were warned by professors on their first day to not use the AI tool to cheat, according to Vice.

Big tech also sees AI apps as a threat to their monopoly. Gmail co-creator Paul Buchheit predicted that ChatGPT would eliminate the need for Google's search engine altogether, thus disrupting the company's main source of revenue. 

There are some who think that governments must intervene to prevent this AI takeover of businesses that will destroy livelihoods.  But it is impossible to suppress technical advances in the marketplace.

Once upon a time, similar concerns were expressed about computers, yet today the personal computer and even smart phones are indispensable to any modern office or home.

Companies, especially smaller businesses, can save valuable funds with the judicious use of AI apps.

We have to remember that since the invention of the wheel, humans have been told that their livelihood is under threat and their existential purpose will be rendered meaningless.  Yet our species has managed to evolve and keep up with the changes. 

Doubtlessly there will be challenges even with AI and humans will have to learn to adapt.

AI is like any other tool; it is up to the humans to decide the level of control and the manner of usage.